Browsed by
Category: Anxiety

What causes lupus?

What causes lupus?

Lupus is indeed a multifactorial disease, where both genetic and environmental factors contribute to its development. While a family history of lupus or other autoimmune diseases can increase the risk of developing lupus, it is not a guarantee. The genetic predisposition might make certain individuals more susceptible, but environmental triggers, such as infections, sun exposure, or certain medications, are often necessary to actually initiate the disease process.

The fact that certain ethnic groups are at higher risk for lupus further supports the genetic component, but also points to possible environmental factors specific to those populations. The significant difference in risk for siblings of lupus patients is a striking example of how genetics can play a key role. However, the complexity of the disease means that even when someone has genetic predispositions, they may never develop lupus if they are not exposed to the environmental triggers.

The interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental triggers is still not fully understood, which is why researchers continue to study both aspects. The role of autoantibodies, like antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), is also a crucial part of lupus, and testing for them helps in diagnosing the disease or assessing its risk in at-risk individuals. But as you mentioned, the presence of autoantibodies alone doesn’t necessarily indicate lupus.

Understanding the precise mechanisms of how genes and environmental factors interact could potentially lead to better prevention strategies or treatments in the future. Do you have any particular aspect of lupus research or genetic studies you’re interested in learning more about?

Genes Associated with Lupus: There has been significant progress in identifying specific genes associated with lupus, which has given researchers valuable insights into the underlying genetic factors contributing to the disease. Some of these genes are involved in the immune system’s regulation, and their malfunction or variation can predispose individuals to autoimmune diseases like lupus. Here are a few key genes and their roles in lupus:

HLA-DR2 and HLA-DR3: The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, particularly HLA-DR2 and HLA-DR3, are strongly associated with an increased risk of developing lupus. These genes help regulate the immune system by presenting foreign substances (antigens) to immune cells, helping the body differentiate between self and non-self. Specific variations in these genes can lead to an immune system that mistakenly attacks the body’s own tissues, contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases like lupus.

IRF5 (Interferon Regulatory Factor 5): The IRF5 gene is involved in the regulation of immune responses, particularly the activation of immune cells. Variations in this gene have been linked to an increased risk of lupus, as it plays a role in the production of type I interferons, which are crucial in the immune system’s defense against infections. In lupus, these interferons can contribute to the overactivation of immune cells and the subsequent attack on healthy tissues.

STAT4 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 4): STAT4 is another gene involved in immune system signaling. It plays a role in the activation of certain immune cells, such as T cells. Mutations or certain variations in STAT4 have been associated with an increased risk of lupus, particularly in individuals of European and Asian descent. STAT4 is part of the signaling pathway that can drive the production of antibodies that target the body’s own tissues.

PTPN22 (Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Non-Receptor Type 22): The PTPN22 gene encodes a protein involved in regulating immune cell activity. Variants of this gene have been associated with lupus and other autoimmune diseases. It is thought that certain mutations in PTPN22 may impair the regulation of immune cell activation, leading to a more aggressive immune response that contributes to the development of lupus.

TNFAIP3 (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Induced Protein 3): The TNFAIP3 gene plays a role in regulating inflammation by controlling the immune response to infection or injury. Variations in this gene have been linked to autoimmune diseases, including lupus. In particular, mutations in TNFAIP3 may affect its ability to regulate immune responses properly, leading to chronic inflammation and immune system dysfunction that can contribute to lupus.

BAFF (B-cell Activating Factor): BAFF is a protein involved in the survival and activation of B cells, which are responsible for producing antibodies. In lupus, there is often an overproduction of BAFF, leading to the survival of autoreactive B cells that contribute to the production of antibodies against the body’s own tissues. The gene that encodes BAFF has been associated with an increased risk of lupus, and therapies targeting BAFF are being explored as potential treatments for lupus.

IRAK1 (Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 1): The IRAK1 gene is involved in the signaling pathways that lead to inflammation. Variants in IRAK1 have been linked to increased susceptibility to lupus, particularly in women, who are more likely to develop the disease. IRAK1 plays a key role in the immune system’s response to infection, and its overactivation may contribute to the chronic inflammation seen in lupus.

Although these genes are associated with lupus risk, it’s important to note that having these genetic variations does not guarantee an individual will develop lupus. The interaction between genetics and environmental factors, such as infections, UV exposure, hormonal changes, and lifestyle factors, also plays a significant role in determining whether someone will develop the disease. Researchers are continuing to explore the complex relationship between genes and environmental triggers to better understand how lupus develops.

MHC Genes: The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) genes are some of the most important genetic factors associated with autoimmune diseases, including lupus. These genes are involved in the immune system’s ability to recognize and respond to pathogens, but when they function abnormally or are involved in genetic susceptibility, they can contribute to autoimmune diseases like lupus.

The MHC genes are located on chromosome 6 and are responsible for encoding molecules that help the immune system distinguish between “self” (the body’s own cells) and “non-self” (foreign invaders, such as pathogens). The two main classes of MHC molecules are:

Class I MHC Molecules (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C)
These molecules are present on nearly all nucleated cells and are primarily responsible for presenting viral or intracellular antigens to cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ T cells).

Class II MHC Molecules (HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, HLA-DR)
These are expressed on antigen-presenting cells (such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells). Class II molecules present foreign antigens to helper T cells (CD4+ T cells), which play a key role in activating other parts of the immune system.

MHC class II and III represent two families of genes known to be associated with lupus. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes help to shape your immune response by coding for proteins that function in response to invaders (antigens). The strength of the association of MHC II genes with lupus varies by ethnicity. MHC III genes code for components of the complement system, a group of proteins that interact to clear immune complexes and affect your body’s inflammatory response. Specifically, lupus involves defects of the genes for complement proteins C4 and C2.

MHC genes, particularly those in the HLA region, are central to the immune system’s ability to distinguish between self and non-self. Variations in these genes are strongly associated with an increased risk of lupus, likely because these genetic variations may alter how the immune system processes and presents self-antigens. While these genes increase susceptibility, environmental triggers are also crucial in the development of lupus.

Understanding the specific interactions between MHC genes, immune system function, and environmental factors is a key area of lupus research, and it holds potential for better diagnostics and treatments in the future.

Other Genes: Other genes have also been associated with the development of lupus. Among these are genes that code for variants of opsonins, molecules that make it easier for cells in your immune response to initiate certain steps. [Specifically, opsonins are involved in the facilitation of phagocytosis, the process in which cells called macrophages swallow antibodies carrying invading particles (antigens).] The specific opsonins involved are two proteins called mannose-binding protein and C-reactive protein.

Genes that code for complement receptors and antibody receptors are also known to be associated with lupus. These receptors are responsible for detecting and binding to pathogens in the body. In addition, genes for cytokines, molecules that function as signaling molecules in your immune system, have also been implicated in the association with lupus. Specifically, researchers have focused on cytokines called tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-10 (IL-10).

Genes that code for molecules called Fcγ-receptors that function to “catch” antibodies carrying antigens also have been linked to lupus nephritis (lupus affecting the kidneys). Specifically, researchers have targeted variants of this gene that cause these receptors to function poorly, causing inefficient clearance of immune system cells from the body.

Hormones and Environmental Factors
Women are 9 times more likely than men to develop lupus. This phenomenon can be explained by sex hormones and the resulting relative strengths of the female and male immune systems. The female body generates and uses larger quantities of estrogen, while the male body relies on hormones called androgens. Estrogen is known to be an “immunoenhancing” hormone, which means that women have stronger immune systems than men. For this reason, the incidence of autoimmune diseases is generally higher in women than in men. Such an observation makes sense in light of the evolutionary need for women to survive to nurture their children.

In addition, certain environmental factors have been linked to the development of lupus. These environmental contributors are difficult to isolate, but researchers have established links between lupus and a variety of toxins, such as cigarette smoke, silica, and mercury. Infectious disease agents such as the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV, which causes mononucleosis or “mono”), herpes zoster virus (the virus that causes shingles), and cytomegalovirus have also been implicated. Certain drugs can cause lupus-like syndrome and exposure to ultraviolet light and stress are known to aggravate lupus symptoms, but none of these factors have been identified as direct causes of the disease.

Lupus Signs, Symptoms, and Co-occuring Conditions

Lupus Signs, Symptoms, and Co-occuring Conditions

Lupus affects everyone differently, but certain signs and symptoms are common. [A sign is a medical evidence your doctor finds during a physical exam, such as a specific rash; a symptom is a subjective indication of disease, such as joint stiffness or a headache.] In addition, other conditions, such as fibromyalgia, occur commonly in people with lupus but are not directly due to disease activity. These co-occurring conditions are known to doctors as “comorbidities.” Several signs, symptoms, and comorbidity of lupus are detailed below.

Fever
The average human body temperature is around 98.5°F, but many people run just above or below that mark. A temperature of 101°F is generally accepted as a fever. Many people with lupus experience reoccurring, low-grade temperatures that do not reach 101°. Such low-grade temperatures may signal oncoming illness or an approaching lupus flare. Fever can also signal inflammation or infection, so it is important to be aware of the patterns of your body and notify your physician of anything unusual.

Joint Stiffness
Many lupus patients experience joint stiffness, especially in the morning. People often find that taking warm showers helps to relieve this problem. If this habit does not offer comfort and joint stiffness prevents you from daily activity, be sure to speak with your doctor. He/she will examine you for any signs of joint swelling and can speak with you about medications that may ease some of this pain and inflammation, such as over-the-counter pain treatments and NSAIDs. Tenderness of a joint in known as arthralgia, and it is important that your doctor distinguish this from the arthritis (true swelling) that may accompany lupus.

If you experience a fever lasting a few days or fevers that come and go over a few days, you should take your temperature twice daily and keep a record. Certain trends may alert your doctor to specific processes occurring in your body. In addition, a fever of 101°F or more should be given medical attention. If you are taking steroid medications such as prednisone, be alert for any sign of infection, since steroids can suppress your immune system while also masking symptoms of infection. Immunosuppressive medications such as azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate also suppress the immune system, so if you begin to feel ill when taking one of these medications, notify your doctor immediately.

Weight Changes / Weight Loss
Increased lupus activity can sometimes cause weight loss, and certain medications can cause loss of appetite. No matter what the cause of your weight loss, you should speak to your doctor to ensure that the loss does not indicate a more serious condition. If you experience a loss of appetite due to your medications, your doctor may suggest alternative medications or solutions to ease stomach discomfort.

Weight Gain
Other medications, such as corticosteroids, can cause weight gain. Therefore, you must speak to your doctor about maintaining a balanced diet while taking these medications. You may need to reduce your calorie consumption; your physician can refer you to a nutrition counselor if needed. Light to moderate exercise can also help you to maintain a healthy weight and cardiovascular system, while also boosting your mood. Please remember that it is very easy to gain weight, especially when taking steroids, but it is much more difficult to lose it. You must try to achieve a healthy weight because women with lupus between the ages of 35 and 44 are fifty times more likely to experience a heart attack than the average woman. In addition, maintaining a healthy weight helps to alleviate stress on your joints and keeps your organs working productively and efficiently.

Fatigue and Malaise
Ninety percent of people with lupus will experience general fatigue and malaise at some point during the disease. Some people find a short 1 ½ hour afternoon nap to be effective in reducing fatigue. However, exceeding this time frame might lead to problems sleeping at night. If you feel that you are tired throughout most of the day and that fatigue prevents you from engaging in daily activities, speak to your doctor. Fatigue accompanied by pain in certain parts of your body may be a sign of a treatable condition called fibromyalgia. Other fatigue-inducing conditions, such as anemia, low thyroid, and depression, can also be treated. If you and your doctor decide that your malaise is due solely to lupus, try to stay as active and mobile as possible during your daily routine. Often this can be difficult, but many people find that slightly pushing themselves to engage in light to moderate exercise actually increases their energy levels. However, you should never push yourself beyond reasonable discomfort.

Sjogren’s Syndrome
As many as 10% of people with lupus may experience a condition called Sjogren’s syndrome, a chronic autoimmune disorder in which the glands that produce tears and saliva do not function correctly. Sjogren’s can also affect people who do not have lupus. People with Sjogren’s often experience dryness of the eyes, mouth, and vagina. They may also feel a gritty or sandy sensation in their eyes, especially in the morning. This dryness occurs because the immune system has begun to attack the moisture-producing glands of the eyes and mouth (the lacrimal and parotid glands, respectively), resulting in decreased tears and saliva.

You must speak to your doctor if you experience dryness of the eyes and mouth since the medications for these conditions must be taken regularly to prevent discomfort and permanent scarring (especially of the tear glands). The Schirmer’s test is usually performed to check for Sjogren’s and involves placing a small piece of litmus paper under the eyelid. Eye symptoms can be relieved by frequent use of Artificial Tears, and an eyedrop medication called Restasis is often used to prevent the worsening of Sjogren’s. Evoxac (or pilocarpine) can be used to increase both tear and saliva production, and certain lozenges (Numoisyn) can also be helpful for dry mouth.

Depression
Depression and anxiety are present in almost one-third of all people with lupus. Clinical depression is different than the passing pangs of sadness that can haunt all of us from time to time. Rather, clinical depression is a prolonged, unpleasant, and disabling condition. The hallmark characteristics of depression are feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, general sadness, and a loss of interest in daily activities. Depression also often involves crying spells, changes in appetite, nonrestful sleep, loss of self-esteem, inability to concentrate, decreased interest in the outside world, memory problems, and indecision. In addition, people who are depressed may suffer from certain physiologic signs, such as headaches, palpitations, loss of sexual drive, indigestion, and cramping. Patients are considered to be clinically depressed when they experience symptoms that last for several weeks and are enough to disrupt their daily lives. Patients suffering from depression also often experience a general slowing and clouding of mental functions, such as memory, concentration, and problem-solving abilities. This phenomenon is sometimes described as a “fog.” The cause of depression is not known; sometimes a genetic component predisposes an individual to the condition. Depression is rarely due to active lupus in the brain.

While clinical depression can be caused by the emotional drain of coping with a chronic medical condition and the sacrifices and adjustments that are required of the disease, it can also be induced by steroid medications (e.g., prednisone) and other physiological factors. You must speak with your doctor if you feel you are experiencing clinical depression because many people who are physically ill respond well to anti-depressant medications. In addition, your doctor may treat your depression in different ways depending on the cause.

Gastrointestinal Problems
Many people with lupus suffer from gastrointestinal problems, especially heartburn caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Peptic ulcers can also occur, often due to certain medications used in lupus treatment, including NSAIDs and steroids. Occasional heartburn or acid indigestion can be treated with an over-the-counter antacid, such as Rolaids, Maalox, Mylanta, or Tums. Your doctor may also include an antacid or another form of GI medication (a proton pump inhibitor, histamine2 blocker, or promotility agent) in your treatment regimen. Antacids are effective when used to treat occasional symptoms, but you should try to avoid heartburn and acid indigestion altogether by eating smaller meals, remaining upright after eating, and cutting down on caffeine. If heartburn and acid reflux persist (e.g., for more than two weeks), you should speak with your doctor, because your heartburn symptoms could indicate a larger problem.

Thyroid Problems
The thyroid is the gland in your neck associated with your metabolism the processes by which your body makes use of energy. Autoimmune thyroid disease is common in lupus. It is believed that about 6% of people with lupus have hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid) and about 1% have hyperthyroidism (overactive thyroid). A thyroid gland that is functioning improperly can affect the function of organs such as the brain, heart, kidneys, liver, and skin. Hypothyroidism can cause weight gain, fatigue, depression, moodiness, and dry hair and skin. Hyperthyroidism can cause weight loss, heart palpitations, tremors, and heat intolerance, and eventually lead to osteoporosis. Treatment for both underactive and overactive thyroid involves getting your body’s metabolism back to the normal rate. Hypothyroidism is usually treated with thyroid hormone replacement therapy. Hyperthyroidism is treated with anti-thyroid medications or radioactive iodine.

Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis (bone thinning) occurs when the bones lose calcium and other minerals that help keep them strong and compact. This condition can lead to fractures, bone pain, and shorter stature. Everyone is at risk for osteoporosis as they age, but women experience a greater risk of the condition after menopause. Studies have shown that people with lupus are at an increased risk for osteoporosis due to both the inflammation they experience with the disease and the use of prednisone.

Your bones are constantly being remodeled in a process that removes old bone cells and deposits new ones. In people with osteoporosis, the bones lose minerals faster than they can be regenerated. Medications called bisphosphonates (e.g., Actonel, Fosamax, Boniva, and Reclast) can be taken to help prevent your bones from losing calcium and other minerals by slowing or stopping the natural processes that dissolve bone tissue. In doing this, bisphosphonates help your bones remain strong and intact. If you have already developed osteoporosis, these medications may slow the thinning of your bones and help prevent bone fractures. In fact, studies have shown that bisphosphonates can lower your risk of fractured vertebrae bone segments that make up your spine by 50%. Similar studies demonstrate that these medications can lower the chance of breaking other bones by 30-49%. However, when bisphosphonates are unsuccessful, patients may need a daily injection of parathyroid hormone (Forteo) to build bone.

Mental Illness Vs. General Stress

Mental Illness Vs. General Stress

It is normal and healthy to feel a variety of emotions. The majority of people will occasionally feel stressed depressed or hopeless. However, observing how your stress and mood affect your day-to-day activities can help you determine whether your depression or anxiety is more severe and may need treatment. You should get help if you can’t take care of yourself or other dependents, or if you can’t finish your work, school, or family responsibilities. You should also think about getting help if you are still able to take care of yourself and complete tasks, but you have been depressed, anxious, or depressed for more than a few days in a row and find it difficult to find even short-term respite. But you don’t have to wait until you’re in pain to get mental health support and assistance. For justice, proactive mental health care is beneficial.

Mental and Physical Health
There is a close relationship between physical and mental health. Additionally, there is proof that both direct biological processes and indirect behavioral effects of mental health have an impact on cardiovascular health. You may have also observed this connection in your daily experiences. If you pay attention, you will likely find your own evidence that the health of your mind and body are closely related. Have you ever been stressed and had trouble sleeping? What about feeling sick to your stomach or experiencing gastrointestinal problems when you are anxious?

Obesity and Mental Health
Although there is a known correlation between obesity and mental health, not all obese people also have mental health problems, and vice versa. Important questions that remain unanswered include defining the nature of the relationship, comprehending causality concerns, and figuring out how to address the link between obesity and mental health. We are aware that obesity and mental health have a complicated relationship, and taking proactive measures to maintain your physical and psychological well-being is equally crucial.

Being obese does not always indicate that one’s mental health will suffer. Nonetheless, the experience of weight stigma and discrimination can decrease one’s self-confidence, self-esteem, and self-worth and is a major contributor to stress, anxiety, and depression for many obese people. Additionally, many obese people endure discrimination, bullying, teasing, and shame both as children and as adults. Poorer mental health is probably a result of these unpleasant experiences, which can happen in a variety of contexts, such as communities, workplaces, friend groups, families, and medical facilities.

Eating Disorders and Obesity
Eating disorders do not always accompany obesity, and vice versa. Nonetheless, these problems significantly co-occur. The two eating disorders that are most frequently researched in obese individuals are binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa, and evidence suggests that these conditions and obesity probably make each other worse. Crucially, individuals who suffer from both eating disorders and obesity are likely to suffer serious psychological and medical consequences.

Mental Health and Weight
Mental health problems can impact your weight in a variety of ways. Mental health conditions can cause weight loss or gain, depending on an individual’s genetics, environment, history, psychology, and other personal factors. More precisely, depression and certain eating disorders are diagnosed based on changes in appetite, weight, and/or eating behavior. Additionally, having negative self-talk or self-evaluation, which is frequently reported by those who are depressed or anxious, can lead to the adoption of unhealthy coping mechanisms, which can then lead to weight change.

Mental Health and Obesity Treatment
A person may be less likely to seek treatment for obesity if they are experiencing mental health problems. For instance, a person’s propensity to seek assistance may be hampered by the behavioral avoidance typical of anxiety disorders or the sluggishness typical of depression. Treatment is impacted by some mental health-related factors in addition to diagnosable mental health conditions. A person may internalize self-blame for being obese as a result of prior encounters with weight stigma and discrimination, which may make them reluctant to seek assistance. Additionally, it could be challenging for those who have relied on food as a coping mechanism for stress, anxiety, or other unpleasant emotional or psychological experiences to alter their eating habits on their own.

Managing Mental Health
Because mental health issues are largely invisible, they are occasionally disregarded. Mental health problems have frequently been dismissed as “all in your head,” in contrast to a broken arm in a cast or the evident pain that comes with the flu. Nonetheless, taking good care of your mental health is equally as crucial as taking care of your physical health. You can manage your mental health in a variety of ways. Individual or group therapy, consulting a physician for medication treatment, or asking friends or family for support are all excellent choices.

Hospital stays are occasionally required in more severe cases to offer the best possible care and support. You can, however, take care of your own mental health in small ways throughout your daily life. One of the best ways to enhance your mental health is to engage in regular physical activity. This exercise can help lower stress, anxiety, and depression without being overly demanding or strenuous. Consuming a range of nutritious foods can also be beneficial. You can expand your mental health care toolkit by engaging in deep breathing exercises, getting regular, high-quality sleep most nights, and using constructive self-talk.

https://mygenericpharmacy.com/category/disease/mental-health

Alzheimer’s: Are newly approved drugs making a real-life difference?

Alzheimer’s: Are newly approved drugs making a real-life difference?

In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally approved some new medications to treat Alzheimer’s disease after a nearly two-decade hiatus. The majority of these medications are antibody treatments that target harmful protein clusters in the brain. Their endorsement has generated equal parts excitement and controversy. In this Special Feature, we look into the fundamental question of whether these medications are actually having an impact. The neurodegenerative condition known as Alzheimer’s disease causes a slow and irreversible loss of thinking, memory, and ultimately the capacity to carry out daily tasks. Alzheimer’s disease is primarily caused by aging, and as the population ages quickly, it has become a public health emergency.

Alzheimer’s disease affected 57 million people worldwide in 2019; by 2050, that figure is predicted to rise to 153 million. This emphasizes the necessity of disease-modifying therapies that alter the course of the illness permanently and slow its progression. The development of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, however, has not been successful until recently. The beta-amyloid protein, whose aberrant accumulation is generally thought to be the cause of Alzheimer’s disease, has been the focus of the majority of clinical research aimed at creating disease-modifying treatments for the condition. Regarded as the first disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, aucanumab, an antibody that targets amyloid-beta protein deposits, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2021.

Nevertheless, aducanumab’s manufacturer, Biogen, announced that it will eventually halt sales after clinical trials failed to yield consistent improvements in cognitive function. Since then, phase 3 clinical trials have shown that two additional anti-amyloid antibodies, lecanemab from Biogen and donanemab from Eli Lily, can slow cognitive decline in people with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. These antibodies have been approved by the FDA. Clinicians and researchers have welcomed the approval of lecanemab and donanemab as a breakthrough after decades of clinical research that failed to yield effective disease-modifying therapies. The modest clinical benefits of these anti-amyloid treatments have, however, drawn criticism from some researchers who point to safety concerns and a lack of cost-effectiveness.

While there are challenges at the clinical, societal, and healthcare levels, we should not forget the opportunities and the breakthrough that after decades of very costly negative trials, we finally have unequivocal evidence that it is possible to reduce the progression of the disease, said Dag Aarsland, MD, professor of old age psychiatry at King’s College London in the United Kingdom, in an interview with Medical News Today. Paresh Malhotra, PhD, who teaches clinical neurology at Imperial College London in the United Kingdom, is comparable. K. pointed out that even though these anti-amyloid treatments are only moderately effective, it’s crucial to understand that they are the first to show clinical effects that seem to be connected to a major mechanism of disease progression. Their introduction could speed up the development of new treatments and revolutionize clinical services for Alzheimer’s disease, the most prevalent cause of dementia in the world.

The amyloid cascade theory is the foundation for the creation of anti-amyloid antibody therapies like lecanemab and donanemab. This theory states that Alzheimer’s disease develops as a result of additional alterations in the brain brought on by the buildup of beta-amyloid protein. In particular, it is thought that the development of beta-amyloid aggregates causes oxidative stress, inflammation, neuronal damage, the loss of synapses the connections between neurons that enable communication and, eventually, cognitive decline. This is supported by the fact that beta-amyloid protein buildup occurs several years before cognitive function, such as memory and decision-making, deteriorates.

Secretase enzymes cleave a larger amyloid precursor protein to produce the beta-amyloid protein. Each beta-amyloid protein unit is known as a monomer, and these monomers can combine to form oligomers, which are soluble short chains made up of two to more than fifty monomers. Larger, soluble protofibrils and insoluble fibrils can also be formed by the aggregation of beta-amyloid monomers. In the extracellular space between neurons, the insoluble fibrils subsequently come together to form plaques.

Amyloid plaques were once believed to be poisonous and to be the cause of Alzheimer’s disease. However, over the last 20 years, research has indicated that beta-amyloid oligomers are more harmful than amyloid plaques and may be more involved in the onset of Alzheimer’s disease. It is believed that poor production or clearance of beta-amyloid protein is the cause of the buildup of beta-amyloid aggregates. Over the last 20 years, some medications have been created that either target the enzymes that produce beta-amyloid or make it easier to remove beta-amyloid aggregates. However, because of their serious side effects or inability to produce the intended clinical effects, these medications have failed to obtain FDA approval.

The only FDA-approved treatments that target beta-amyloid aggregates are the anti-amyloid antibodies lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab. The affinity of these antibodies for the different kinds of beta-amyloid protein aggregates varies. While aducanumab and lecanemab bind to beta-amyloid oligomers, protofibrils, and plaques, donanemab binds to a particular type of beta-amyloid that is exclusively present in plaques. While aducanumab has a greater affinity for insoluble fibrils, lecanemab exhibits the highest affinity for beta-amyloid protofibrils.

Activating an immune response against beta-amyloid aggregates and causing their removal is one of the hypothesized mechanisms by which anti-amyloid antibodies generate their therapeutic effects. Additionally, anti-amyloid antibodies may neutralize the plaques by binding to oligomers or destabilizing them. In 2021, the FDA gave aducanumab accelerated approval for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease because of its capacity to remove amyloid plaques. Although aducanumab was effective in removing amyloid plaques from the brain, different clinical trials showed different effects on cognitive function.

The FDA’s approval process caused controversy, and doctors were reluctant to prescribe aducanumab because of the lack of evidence supporting its therapeutic effects. Additionally, as was already mentioned, Biogen has halted aducanumab’s development and sales as of 2024. On the other hand, lecanemab and donanemab have both demonstrated the capacity to remove amyloid plaques while delaying the course of the illness. People with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and lower baseline beta-amyloid levels respond better to these treatments. The FDA has approved the intravenous infusion of lecanemab and donanemab for use in patients with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease, including those with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer’s disease.

Donanemab must be administered every four weeks, while lecanemab should be given every two weeks. Donanemab’s ability to allow patients to stop treatment once they have achieved total plaque clearance is one of its special qualities. Amyloid plaques develop over some years, and it is thought that people may only need minor additional care. Lecanemab and donanemab phase 3 trial participants demonstrated slower declines in cognitive function by 27% and 36%, respectively, when compared to placebo.

These results, according to some researchers, are mild and on par with symptomatic treatments like acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which reduce symptoms without altering the course of the illness. Additionally, the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) was used to measure the cognitive changes mentioned above. Additionally, when comparing the anti-amyloid antibody treatment groups to the placebo group, researchers found that the absolute difference in decline in cognitive function, as measured by the difference in scores on the CDR-SB scale, did not indicate a clinically significant effect of these anti-amyloid therapies.

Donanemab treatment only resulted in a 14–8% slower decline in cognitive function, according to more objective measures of cognition like the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]. Stated differently, it has been suggested that the evidence currently available indicates that the clinical benefit of these anti-amyloid medications may be minimal. These medications’ effectiveness only results in a statistically significant but clinically meaningless slower decline rather than improvements. The clinical advantages of anti-amyloid antibodies, according to some researchers, support the amyloid cascade theory. Others, however, contend that there are still a lot of unanswered questions, making this conclusion premature.

The amyloid-beta hypothesis states that Alzheimer’s disease should have progressed more slowly as a result of aducanumab’s capacity to remove plaque. Nevertheless, detractors contend that aducanumab trials demonstrated efficient amyloid plaque removal without consistently yielding therapeutic benefits. Similarly, donanemab only caused a 14–8% slower decline in cognitive function as determined by MMSE scores, despite removing roughly 85% of plaques from patients in the phase III trial. Crucially, the amyloid cascade theory served as the foundation for the FDA’s decision to approve aducanumab. The buildup of tau protein within neurons is another aspect of Alzheimer’s disease, and the degree of tau accumulation—rather than beta-amyloid—is linked to the severity of cognitive decline.

The notion that beta-amyloid plays a key role in the development and progression of Alzheimer’s disease is being leveraged by pharmaceutical interventions that aim to reduce beta-amyloid or its production. Many people have contested this theory. Additionally, the outcomes of clinical trials for these drugs show a high associated risk and little efficacy. Therefore, some researchers contend that the modest effectiveness of anti-amyloid antibodies suggests that the beta-amyloid pathway contributes to the development of Alzheimer’s disease along with other pathways, rather than suggesting that the beta-amyloid pathway plays a focal role in the disease’s development.

This theory holds that Alzheimer’s disease develops as a result of a complex network of factors, including those linked to the environment, oxidative stress, inflammation, metabolic factors, and genes unrelated to the amyloid pathway. This perspective also suggests that anti-amyloid treatments, when used in conjunction with other therapies, may play a part in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. On the other hand, beta-amyloid aggregation might be a sign of other compromised biological pathways or a downstream phenomenon. According to Perlmutter, it is now evident that the activation of the brain’s microglial cells is largely dependent on metabolic dysfunction upstream of amyloid plaque formation. This phenotypic shift both promotes the formation of beta-amyloid and decreases its degradation.

Furthermore, microglial activation causes synaptic degradation and jeopardizes neuron viability, two key characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease. As has now been shown in early research employing GLP-1 agonists, treatments that target brain metabolism will therefore probably offer significant benefits for Alzheimer’s disease, Perlmutter continued. It is necessary to balance the risks, expenses, and accessibility of anti-amyloid antibody therapies against the limited clinical benefits they offer. A considerable percentage of participants in the phase 3 clinical trials for lecanemab (45%) and donanemab (89%) experienced adverse effects.

For example, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are alterations in the brain that frequently occur in patients receiving anti-amyloid antibody treatments. These changes, which include either small areas of bleeding from blood vessel rupture (microhemorrhage) or brain swelling (edema), are seen during routine follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. In the phase 3 trials, for example, ARIA was observed in 21 percent and 36 percent of patients treated with lecanemab and donanemab, respectively. The majority of ARIA cases are asymptomatic and go away in ten weeks.

Even though ARIA symptoms are usually mild to moderate, there have been reports of serious side effects like seizures and even death. In the phase III donanemab clinical trial, for example, approximately 1 in 6 participants experienced severe adverse effects related to ARIA, while the donanemab group experienced a death rate of 0 in 35. The long-term consequences of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, even those that are mild to moderate in severity, are unknown, in addition to worries about these grave side effects. Adverse effects like nausea, fever, rash, and dizziness are also linked to the infusion of these anti-amyloid antibodies.

Of patients treated with lecanemab and donanemab, respectively, 24 and 8 percent experienced such infusion-related reactions. Regular MRI scans and clinical follow-ups are required due to these amyloid-related imaging abnormalities and other side effects. In the phase III trials for lecanemab and donanemab, people who had at least one copy of the APOE4 gene a gene associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease—were more likely to experience brain swelling.

Additionally, these medications were less effective in people who had one or more copies of APOE4. Therefore, before beginning anti-amyloid therapy, people must undergo genetic screening. Anti-amyloid immunotherapies are also linked to an increase in the volume of the brain’s fluid-filled ventricles and a decrease in the volume of the entire brain. Reduced cognition is linked to both a decrease in the volume of the entire brain and an increase in the volume of the ventricles. It’s unclear, though, if these alterations in brain volume and cognitive function are causally related. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effects of these alterations in brain volume following anti-amyloid therapies. It’s interesting to note that donanemab treatment led to a lesser decrease in the volume of the hippocampus, a part of the brain essential for memory and learning.

It is unlikely that many people with Alzheimer’s disease will fit the requirements to be enrolled in lecanemab or donanemab clinical trials. These studies’ participants were younger and had fewer co-occurring illnesses. Therefore, treating a real-world population of people with Alzheimer’s and co-occurring conditions is likely to result in more side effects or decreased effectiveness. The healthcare system faces additional challenges in diagnosing and screening patients who qualify for anti-amyloid therapies, in addition to managing side effects.

The majority of people with Alzheimer’s disease are not identified until the disease is advanced, and early detection would necessitate screening a large number of people with imaging tests or measuring biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid. Therefore, widespread availability would require a significant financial outlay for APOE4 genetic testing, early Alzheimer’s disease screening, and diagnosis, and the monitoring and treatment of ARIAs and infusion-related reactions, regardless of their severity. A third of dementia patients in the UK do not receive a diagnosis at all, and certain diagnostic tests are necessary to confirm eligibility for new treatment. To make sure that those who qualify for new treatments can get them when they work best, which seems to be in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease, we need to invest in diagnostic infrastructure and personnel.

Treating anxiety, and depression linked to better heart disease outcomes

Treating anxiety, and depression linked to better heart disease outcomes

There are two common mental health conditions: anxiety and depression. Well-being depends on treating these conditions appropriately, and research is still being done to determine how treatment affects other health issues, such as heart health. In individuals who had already suffered from serious cardiac issues, a recent study that was published in the Journal of the American Heart AssociationTrusted Source looked at the effects of anxiety and depression treatment on heart health outcomes.

Researchers who used medication and psychotherapy to treat depression or anxiety in over 1,500 participants found that they were 75% less likely to return to the emergency room and 74% less likely to have to stay in the hospital after discharge. The findings emphasize how critical mental health disorders must be treated to improve outcomes for patients with pre-existing cardiac issues. The mental health condition of depression is prevalent. A persistent sense of hopelessness and a decrease in energy are common in people with depression. Their daily activities might be difficult for them to carry out.

An additional prevalent mental health issue is anxiety. Individuals who suffer from anxiety may have trouble falling asleep, worry all the time, and feel restless. Anxious people may also be more susceptible to depressionTrusted Source. Physical and mental health are inversely correlated. For instance, individuals with depression may experience worsening symptoms from both their chronic illnesses, such as diabetes or heart disease. Additionally, anxiety may increase a person’s risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease and mental health are closely related, with effects on both conditions occurring simultaneously. Heart disease risk factors include elevated blood pressure and physiological stress, which can be experienced by people with disorders like depression and anxiety.

Furthermore, he pointed out, that they might be more likely to adopt lifestyle changes, like smoking and inactivity, that can raise their risk of cardiovascular disease even further. On the other hand, following a stressful acute cardiovascular event, patients with heart disease, such as those who experience a heart attack, stroke, or heart failure, are more likely to experience mental health disorders like anxiety, depression, or PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder].

Researchers are not entirely sure of the precise relationship that exists between physical conditions and mental illness. The goal of the current study was to learn more about the connections between anxiety and depression and specific cardiac issues. This study used a retrospective cohort design and was population-based. Using Medicaid data from Ohio, researchers included 1,563 participants in their analysis. The participants experienced anxiety or depression in addition to heart failure or coronary artery disease. Additionally, they had been admitted to the hospital for the first time due to ischemic heart disease or heart failure.

The relationship between anxiety and depression treatment and hospital readmission, ER visits for heart failure and coronary artery disease, all-cause mortality, and heart disease mortality was examined by researchers. They examined whether participants were receiving psychotherapy and whether they were using antidepressants. Many covariates, such as biological sex, Medicaid eligibility, and ethnicity, were noted and taken into consideration. Several models that were adjusted for distinct covariates were run. According to the analysis, patients with depression or anxiety who also received medication saw the greatest reductions in risk and the greatest benefits.

Nonetheless, there were improvements in rehospitalization and ER visits for every group that got treatment. Researchers did not find any appreciable drops in the mortality risk from heart disease in patients receiving treatment for depression and anxiety. Individuals who got both medication and psychotherapy had a 75% lower chance of returning to the hospital, a 74% lower risk of requiring ER visits, and a 66% lower risk of dying from any cause. The findings highlight the significance of treating mental illness in heart disease patients to help improve the course of their condition.

MD, a professor of internal medicine at Ohio State’s Wexner Medical Center and director of cardiovascular research for the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, outlined the study’s conclusions. He informed us that patients with anxiety or depression who have been admitted to the hospital due to heart failure or coronary artery disease benefit from mental health treatments that include medication, psychotherapy, or both.

The biggest benefits go to those who receive both medication and psychotherapy together. The likelihood of dying is lowered in every instance, and there are notable decreases in the need to visit the ER or return to the hospital. The study emphasizes how critical it is to identify mental health conditions in patients with cardiovascular disease, such as depression and anxiety. It is particularly crucial for vulnerable groups, including the elderly, people with advanced heart disease, and people who have previously been admitted to the hospital due to cardiovascular illness.

There are several restrictions on this study. Initially, since it only included Ohio Medicaid participants and collected information from their filed claims, certain information might be absent. Furthermore, no causal relationship between the factors the researchers looked at could be found in the research. Since white people made up the bulk of the participants, future research could concentrate on looking at other groups. Additionally, adults over 64 were not included in the research; therefore, older participants should be included in future studies. Furthermore, the study was conducted over a relatively short period; therefore, longer-term research may be necessary to validate these results.

It’s possible that some confounders were overlooked and that other factors, like the severity of the illness, were not taken into account. Additionally, they were unable to use standardized assessments to validate the mental health diagnoses. This was a retrospective study, and more prospective research is needed to determine the effectiveness of mental health therapies for heart disease patients. Mechanistic research will improve our ability to prevent and treat mental health issues as well as heart disease by clarifying the physiological links between the two conditions.

REFERENCES:
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/treating-anxiety-depression-linked-to-better-heart-disease-outcomes
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/study-anxiety-depression-treatment-linked-with-heart-disease-outcomes
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240320/Treatment-for-anxiety-and-depression-associated-with-improved-heart-disease-outcomes.aspx

Medications that have been suggested by doctors worldwide are available here
https://mygenericpharmacy.com/index.php?cPath=31
https://mygenericpharmacy.com/index.php?cPath=30